- DTN Headline News
Judge Challenges 2022 ERP Payments
By Chris Clayton
Thursday, June 13, 2024 8:32AM CDT

OMAHA (DTN) -- A federal judge in Texas has ruled that USDA discriminated against white farmers in the way it set up the 2022 Emergency Relief Program.

Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk of the U.S. District Court of Northern Texas, a 2019 appointee by former President Donald Trump, issued an injunction June 7 against USDA from making or increasing payments or providing additional relief for "socially disadvantaged farmers or ranchers" or "underserved farmers or ranchers."

The impact of the ruling is unclear given that all the funding from the 2022 Emergency Relief Program (ERP), about $3.2 billion, has already been distributed to producers.

While USDA programs for socially disadvantaged farmers go back more than three decades, Kacsmaryk suggested in his injunction that those programs discriminate based on race and gender.

The injunction comes from a lawsuit filed by four farmers who argued that USDA harmed their operations by providing more aid to other producers based on race and gender.

The four farmers, represented by the Southeastern Legal Foundation and Mountain States Legal Foundation, argued USDA changed the disaster payment program under the 2022 ERP from a "flat-rate relief model" to a "progressive payment factor," which was a major shift in how USDA calculated disaster payments to producers.

In his ruling, Kacsmaryk focused on racial and sex discrimination, stating both classifications are "presumptively unconstitutional," and the 2022 ERP discriminated on the basis of race and gender by favoring minorities and women.

Kacsmaryk, in his injunction, said "there is little question that ERP 2022, which is an ongoing program, is racially discriminatory."

A USDA spokesman told DTN Political Correspondent Jerry Hagstrom, "As a general rule, USDA does not comment on pending litigation."

USDA's definition of "socially disadvantaged farmers" goes back to the 1990 farm bill and the language has been used mainly to provide lower interest on USDA loans and loan guarantees, though it offers benefits for conservation programs as well. Those groups include African Americans, American Indians or Alaskan natives, Hispanics, and Asians or Pacific Islanders. The language has been maintained in every farm bill since then. Kacsmaryk cited that USDA's justification for socially disadvantaged benefits "consistently fail when challenged in court." Kacsmaryk cited rulings against USDA in 2021 over a provision passed by Congress that would have wiped out loan debt for black farmers.

Farm groups and members of Congress complained last year when USDA worked the progressive payment factor into the ERP, which paid farmers for disasters in 2022. A dozen Republican senators wrote the Government Accountability Office calling for an investigation into the program. USDA maintained that a formula was needed because Congress provided $3.2 billion in disaster aid to cover as much as $10.5 billion in uncovered losses in 2022, according to an American Farm Bureau Federation analysis of disaster losses.

Under the progressive payment factor, farmers with smaller losses received a higher percentage of their claims. Farmers with losses below $30,000 received higher payments than farmers with losses higher than $30,000.

USDA issued a total of 344,773 payments under the 2022 ERP. The Farm Service Agency cited last December that 278,834 farmers received higher payments than they otherwise would have received while 65,939 farmers received lower payments than if the flat-rate factor was used.

USDA also released statistics showing more farmers actually received higher payments, but larger farmers received fewer payments under the 2022 ERP.

Farmers Alan and Amy West, Bryan Baker and Rusty Strickland sued USDA over the program arguing that the department unlawfully provided more aid to farmers based on race and gender.

Kacsmaryk in his injunction against USDA noted the plaintiffs received only one-tenth of the payments they would have otherwise received if they had been considered socially disadvantaged.

The Farm Service Agency also provided underserved producers -- beginning farmers, socially disadvantaged farmers and veterans -- refunds on their crop insurance premiums.

Under the 2022 ERP, Rusty Strickland received $7,272.71 in payments while his wife, considered a socially disadvantaged farmer, received $71,900.96 -- a major difference was based on the refund of insurance premiums.

USDA cited justification for returning insurance premiums to socially disadvantaged farmers under the program because they are "more likely to lack financial reserves and access to capital."

Kacsmaryk cited that USDA "lacks a compelling interest" to racially discriminate against white farmers in the disaster program.

The Wests also had applied to USDA's Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) to replace a pair of center pivots through the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP). They were told that whether a farmer was socially disadvantaged was a ranking factor in whether they received funding. With that, Kacsmaryk cited that an injunction could "redress Plaintiffs' stigmatic harm in their ongoing applications to USDA programs." Still, Kacsmaryk tailored his injunction to only apply to the 2022 ERP payments.

Also see, "USDA Pushes Back on Congressional Criticism of ERP Payment Math," https://www.dtnpf.com/…

Chris Clayton can be reached at Chris.Clayton@dtn.com

Follow him on social platform X @ChrisClaytonDTN


blog iconDTN Blogs & Forums
DTN Market Matters Blog
Editorial Staff
Friday, June 14, 2024 11:00AM CDT
Friday, June 14, 2024 11:00AM CDT
Friday, June 7, 2024 12:22PM CDT
Technically Speaking
Editorial Staff
Monday, June 10, 2024 8:20AM CDT
Monday, June 3, 2024 9:36AM CDT
Tuesday, May 28, 2024 9:39AM CDT
Fundamentally Speaking
Joel Karlin
DTN Contributing Analyst
Thursday, June 13, 2024 9:17AM CDT
Thursday, June 13, 2024 9:17AM CDT
Friday, June 7, 2024 7:52AM CDT
DTN Ag Policy Blog
Chris Clayton
DTN Ag Policy Editor
Friday, June 14, 2024 6:46AM CDT
Thursday, June 13, 2024 2:06PM CDT
Friday, June 7, 2024 2:36PM CDT
DTN Ag Weather Forum
Bryce Anderson
DTN Ag Meteorologist and DTN Analyst
Friday, June 14, 2024 11:24AM CDT
Thursday, June 13, 2024 12:59PM CDT
Wednesday, June 12, 2024 10:29AM CDT
DTN Production Blog
Pam Smith
Crops Technology Editor
Tuesday, June 11, 2024 3:33PM CDT
Monday, June 3, 2024 1:29PM CDT
Thursday, May 30, 2024 12:35PM CDT
Harrington's Sort & Cull
John Harrington
DTN Livestock Analyst
Monday, June 10, 2024 12:07PM CDT
Monday, June 3, 2024 2:50PM CDT
Monday, May 20, 2024 4:25PM CDT
South America Calling
Editorial Staff
Thursday, May 23, 2024 11:16AM CDT
Thursday, May 16, 2024 11:37AM CDT
Thursday, May 16, 2024 11:37AM CDT
An Urban’s Rural View
Urban Lehner
Editor Emeritus
Tuesday, June 11, 2024 11:33AM CDT
Monday, June 3, 2024 3:21PM CDT
Wednesday, May 22, 2024 8:33AM CDT
Canadian Markets
Cliff Jamieson
Canadian Grains Analyst
Monday, June 3, 2024 9:25AM CDT
Sunday, April 28, 2024 6:02PM CDT
Monday, April 15, 2024 1:57PM CDT
Editor’s Notebook
Greg D. Horstmeier
DTN Editor-in-Chief
Friday, June 14, 2024 2:37PM CDT
Thursday, May 2, 2024 5:10AM CDT
Thursday, May 2, 2024 5:10AM CDT
Copyright DTN. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.
Powered By DTN